S Purna Chandra Shekhar
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India
Scientific Tracks Abstracts: Health Care Curr Rev
This orderly survey expected to investigate the impacts of a physical exercise (PE) program on Low Back Pain (LBP) manifestations of office workers and the change of adaptability and scope of movement (ROM), solid strength and personal satisfaction (QoL). A writing research was performed on Pub Med, Scopus, MEDLINE, and SPORT Discus from April to May 2018. The watchword "low back pain" was related with "office laborer" OR "VDT administrators" OR "office representatives" OR "work environment" AND "exercise", OR "exercise treatment" OR "physical movement". Incorporation models were a home-or work-based exercise convention for office workers with LBP side effects and pre-to post-mediation assessment of LBP indications. Three specialists freely inspected all modified works. The adjusted Cochrane strategic quality measures were utilized for quality appraisal and 11 articles were incorporated. Exercise conventions were performed from 6 weeks to a year, 1–multi day out of every week, enduring 10–60 min for every meeting. Physical Exercise in the working environment worked on every one of the thought about results. The best improvement was recorded in regulated conventions and in video-upheld conventions acted in the working environment. The impact might be produced with little span meetings during the functioning day, with just 10–15 min of adjusted exercise to be performed 3–5 days of the week. Keywords: Physical Exercise, Pain, Office Workers.
References:
1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et. al. (2006). Chapter 4: European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J.; 15(suppl 2): pp. S192–S300.
2. Waddell G. (2004) The Back Pain Revolution. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
3. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et. al. (2012). A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum.; 64: pp. 2028 –2037.
4. Walker BF (2000). The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord.; 13: pp. 205–217.
5. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. (2008). A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J.; 8: pp. 8 –20.
6. Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, et. al. (2009). Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ.; 339: pp. b3829.
7. da C Menezes Costa L, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, et. al. (2012). The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ.; 184: pp. E613–E624.
8. van Tulder MW (2006). Chapter 1: European guidelines. Eur Spine J.; 15: pp. 134 –135.
9. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, et. al. (2011). A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J.; 20: pp. 19 –39.
10. Smith C, Grimmer-Somers K (2010). The treatment effect of exercise programmes for chronic low back pain. J Eval Clin Pract.; 16: pp. 484 – 491.
11. Choi BK, Verbeek JH, Tam WW, Jiang JY (2012). Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.; (1):CD006555.
12. Machado LA, de Souza MV, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML (2006). The McKenzie method for low back pain: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 31: pp. 254 –262.
S Purna Chandra Shekhar has completed his PhD in Physiotherapy and MPT Cardio Respiratory Disorders from CMJ UNIVERSITY Meghalaya ( UGC RECOGNISED), BPT from KTG College of Physiotherapy Bengaluru, Karnataka State. He worked as Assistant Professor in Sree Ratna College of Physiotherapy Hyderabad, Telangana. Now working as a Associate Professor in Indhira College of Physiotherapy (Maharashtra University of Health Sciences) Nanded Maharashtra India.