Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability
A two-way crossover bioequivalence study of cefadroxil after single oral administration of droxil and ultracef suspensions to 24 healthy human volunteers
5th World Congress on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Pharmaceutical R&D Summit
September 29-October 01, 2014 DoubleTree by Hilton Baltimore-BWI Airport, USA

F A Mohammed

Accepted Abstracts: J Bioequiv Availab

Abstract:

T his study presents a two-way, single oral dose, two-weeks washout, crossover bioequivalence study carried out on 24 human volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two locally marketed pharmaceutical products containing cefadroxil, namely, droxil suspension (Test product commercially marketed suspension containing 500 mg of cefadroxil per 10 ml, produced by the United Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Company, Amman, Jordan) and ULTRACEF  suspension (Reference product, commercially marketed suspension containing 500 mg of cefadroxil per 10 ml, produced by Bristol Laboratories, USA). The two products were administered to 24 healthy human volunteers under fasting condition. Following drug administration, venous blood samples (8 ml) for determination of cefadroxil were collected pre-dose (0 hours) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25,1.50, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours after drug administration. Plasma was separated immediately by centrifugation and stored at -20?C until analysis. Cefadroxil analysis was carried out by a fully developed HPLC assay procedure. The results obtained revealed that the two products were bioequivalent as indicated by the absence of statistical differences in the plasma concentrations or Pharmacokinetics parameters of the two products. The two products therefore can be alternatively prescrib