Journal of Advanced Chemical Engineering

Waste-to-Energy Technologies in Chemical Manufacturing

Steen Parn^* Department of Process Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
^*Correspondence: Steen Parn, Department of Process Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, Email:

Received: 24-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. ACE-23-24084; Editor assigned: 27-Nov-2023, Pre QC No. ACE-23-24084 (PQ); Reviewed: 12-Dec-2023, QC No. ACE-23-24084; Revised: 19-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. ACE-23-24084 (R); Published: 26-Dec-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2090-4568.23.13.321

Description

Waste-to-Energy (WtE) technologies have emerged as capable solutions within the scope of chemical manufacturing, offering a sustainable approach to address waste management while simultaneously generating energy. This innovative concept involves the conversion of various forms of waste, including biomass, municipal solid waste, and industrial byproducts, into usable energy sources through different chemical processes. The utilization of waste as a feedstock for energy production not only reduces the burden on landfills but also contributes to the diversification of energy resources, promoting a more sustainable and circular economy [1-3].

The primary objective of waste-to-energy technologies in chemical manufacturing is to extract value from waste streams that would otherwise be discarded, contributing to resource efficiency and mitigating environmental impacts. One of the prominent methods employed in WtE is thermochemical conversion, encompassing processes such as combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis. These processes involve the application of heat to transform waste materials into energy carriers like heat, electricity, or biofuels [4].

Combustion, the most established form of WtE, involves the controlled burning of waste to generate heat, subsequently converted into electricity through steam turbines. While combustion provides an efficient means to produce energy, it often raises concerns about air pollutant emissions and the release of greenhouse gases. Technological advancements and stringent emission control systems have significantly reduced these environmental impacts, making combustion a viable WtE option [5].

Gasification, another thermochemical process, converts organic materials into a synthesis gas (syngas) composed of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. This syngas can then be utilized to generate electricity, produce biofuels, or serve as a chemical feedstock. Gasification offers several advantages, including a higher energy efficiency compared to combustion and the ability to handle a wider range of waste materials. Moreover, it enables the production of valuable chemicals or fuels, contributing to the circular economy by creating additional revenue streams from waste.

Pyrolysis, a process involving the thermal decomposition of organic materials in the absence of oxygen, results in the production of bio-oil, char, and gases. Bio-oil obtained from pyrolysis can be refined into transportation fuels, while the char can serve as a soil amendment or activated carbon. Pyrolysis offers potential benefits in terms of energy recovery and resource utilization, especially for biomass and organic waste materials [6-8].

Apart from thermochemical processes, biological methods such as anaerobic digestion and fermentation also play a significant role in waste-to-energy technologies. Anaerobic digestion involves the breakdown of organic waste by microorganisms in an oxygenfree environment, generating biogas composed primarily of methane and carbon dioxide. Biogas can be utilized for electricity generation or upgraded to produce biomethane for use as a renewable natural gas or transportation fuel. Fermentation processes, commonly used in the conversion of organic waste, produce biofuels like ethanol or biodiesel, contributing to the reduction of fossil fuel dependency [9].

The implementation of waste-to-energy technologies in chemical manufacturing, however, faces challenges related to technological feasibility, economic viability, and regulatory frameworks. The variability of waste composition and quality, as well as the high initial investment costs associated with establishing WtE facilities, pose significant hurdles. Moreover, concerns regarding emissions, residue management, and public perception necessitate stringent environmental regulations and community engagement to ensure the acceptance and sustainability of these technologies [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, waste-to-energy technologies in chemical manufacturing represent a compelling avenue to address waste management challenges while harnessing renewable energy sources. Thermochemical and biological conversion methods offer diverse approaches to convert waste materials into valuable energy resources, contributing to sustainable development and resource conservation. However, the successful implementation of WtE technologies requires continued technological advancements, supportive policies, and stakeholder collaboration to overcome challenges and maximize the potential of converting waste into a valuable asset in the energy landscape.

References

1. Liu H, Kwak JI, Wang D, An YJ. Multigenerational effects of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Res. 2021;193:110569.
2. Feng H, Zheng N, Peng W, Ni C, Song H. Upcycling of dynamic thiourea thermoset polymers by intrinsic chemical strengthening. Nat commun. 2022 19; 13(1):397.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Zou W, Dong J, Luo Y, Zhao Q, Xie T. Dynamic covalent polymer networks: from old chemistry to modern day innovations. Adv Mater. 2017; 29(14):1606100.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Kim SH, Woo SW, Kim CS, Lee SE, Kim TO. Hydrogen production by electrochemical reaction using ethylene glycol with terephthalic acid. RSC Adv. 2021;11(4):2088-2095.
5. Averochkin GM, Gordeev EG, Skorobogatko MK, Kucherov FA, Ananikov VP. Systematic Study of Aromatic-Ring-Targeted Cycloadditions of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Platform Chemicals. ChemSusChem. 2021 ;14(15):3110-3123.
6. Scheutz GM, Lessard JJ, Sims MB, Sumerlin BS. Adaptable crosslinks in polymeric materials: resolving the intersection of thermoplastics and thermosets. J Am Chem Soc. 2019 16; 141(41):16181-96.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Montarnal D, Capelot M, Tournilhac F, Leibler L. Silica-like malleable materials from permanent organic networks. Science. 2011 18; 334(6058):965-8.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobágyi T, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013 ;43(7):627-641.
9. Chen R, Zhang S, Yang X, Li G, Zhou H, Li Q, Zhang Y. Thermal behaviour and kinetic study of co-pyrolysis of microalgae with different plastics. Waste Manag. 2021;126:331-339.
10. Podgórski M, Fairbanks BD, Kirkpatrick BE, McBride M, Martinez A. Toward stimuli-responsive dynamic thermosets through continuous development and improvements in covalent adaptable networks (CANs). Adv Mater. 2020;32(20):1906876.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]