Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • Scimago
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Scholarsteer
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development

Research Article - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 7

Survival, Growth Response, Chemical and Biochemical Characteristics of the Carcass of Clarias jaensis (Boulenger, 1909) Post Fingerlings Fed Various Dietary Energy
Tsoupou Kuété Suzy Gwladys1*, Kpoumie Nsangou Amidou2, Tonfack Achile Peguy3, Komguep Nganyo Ronald4, Tchouante Tzukam Christelle G4, Vemo Bertin Narcisse5, Tasse Taboue Géraud C6, Ngueguim Jules Romain1 and Efole Ewoukem Thomas7
 
1Department of Animal and Fish Production, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Kribi, Cameroon
2Department of Aquaculture, Institute of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
3Department of Animal and Fish production, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Garoua, Cameroon
4Department of Zootechnics, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
5Department of Animal Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
6Department of Animal and Fish Production, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Bangante, Cameroon
7Department of Aquatic Ecosystem’s Management, Institute of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
 
*Correspondence: Tsoupou Kuété Suzy Gwladys, Department of Animal and Fish Production, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Kribi, Cameroon, Email:

Received: 12-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. JARD-23-22159; Editor assigned: 14-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. JARD-23-22159(PQ); Reviewed: 02-Aug-2023, QC No. JARD-23-22159; Revised: 09-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. JARD-23-22159(R); Published: 16-Aug-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2155-9546.23.14.777

Abstract

This study aimed to improve the knowledge on the growth of post fingerling Clarias jaensis endogenous catfish of Cameroon in order to enhance it. For this purpose, 360 males and females with a mean weight and total length of (97 ± 9 g and 24 ± 1,5 cm) were divided into four comparable groups receiving 13.75 MJ/kg, 14.04 MJ/kg, 15,82 MJ/kg and 16.11 MJ/kg repeated 3 times (15 males and 15 females/repetition). Results shows that the energy level did not have a significant effect on the percent survival, consumption index, and K factor. All other growth characteristics were significantly affected (P<0.05) by the energy level. The highest feed consumption (337.37 ± 5.07 g) was recorded with 16.11 MJ/kg. Live weight (244.41 ± 35.0 g), total length (31.12 ± 2.12 cm), weight gain (146.27 ± 33.86 g), mean daily gain (1.08 ± 0.25 g), specific growth rate (0.67 ± 0.11%/day) and dry matter (31.63 ± 1.55%) where higher in fish fed 14.04 MJ/kg.

The males outperformed the females with regard to all growth characteristics. Lipid content (8.31 ± 0.14%) where higher in the group receiving 16.11 MJ/kg (P<0.05). Protein, ash and all biochemical characteristics of the carcass were not significantly affected (P>0.05) by the energy level.

Keywords

Clarias jaensis, Energy, Growth, Post fingerlings, Survival

Introduction

Due to the growing demand in relation to the population explosion, fishing alone can no longer satisfy the need for fisheries resources in a sustainable way. Indeed, it is limited because of pollution, diseases, climate change, destruction and degradation of habitat by human actions and especially overexploitation that threatens nearly 30% of the fishery resources [1,2]. Aquaculture is proposed as an alternative to remedy this situation. The practice of aquaculture, which continues to grow over the years contributes to preserving natural stocks, repopulating the inland and marine waters [3,4]. It also helps maintain fish consumption and satisfy the protein demand of the world’s population, estimated to reach 9 billion in 2050 [5]. Aquaculture is therefore a means of achieving one of the development objectives which is ensuring a sustainable environment through the preservation and enhancement of biodiversity. Despite the diversity of fish resources in Cameroon, the main species raised were introduced. Today, the need to domesticate endogenous farmed aquaculture species that have the advantage of better adapting to environmental conditions is a solution to increase the aquaculture potential, preserve and enhance biodiversity. That is why an interest has been granted to an endogenous fishery resource belonging to the family Clariidae. This family is characterized by its hardiness, omnivorous diet, rapid growth (3 g/day) correlated with its ability to efficiently transform the compound feed and its highly appreciated meat [6,7]. The domestication of Clarias jaensis requires a knowledge of its farming techniques, particularly feeding, because it accounts for nearly 70% of production costs. In addition, one of the important aspects of nutrition is the determination of nutritional needs. The protein requirements of Clarias jaensis and the effect of food energy on growth characteristics of Clarias jaensis fingerlings have already been studied [8,9]. However, no work on the determination of its energy requirement from the post-fingerlings size to the commercial size has been recorded. The energy level of the diet regulates feed consumption, affects growth, protein utilization efficiency, and body fat accumulation [10]. It’s in this context that, this work was initiated with the general objective of contributing to the best knowledge of endogenous Claridae growth, through the determination of their energy requirements.

Materials and Methods

This study is the follow-up to that carried out by on Clarias jaensis Fingerlins. Indeed, our research team had carried out a first work on the determination of the energy requirement of fingerlings of Clarias jaensis [9]. The difference between this present work and that of lies in the determination of the energy requirements of Clarias jaensis from the post-fingerlings size to the commercial size [9]. In this work we also evaluated the effect of food energy level on the chemical and biochemical characteristics of the carcass of Clarias jaensis. Therefore, the methodology used in this work is similar to that used by Tsoupou K. S. G [9].

Zone of the study

The study took place in the west region of Cameroon and at the Application and Research Farm of the University of Dschang (5˚44’ LN-5˚36’ and 5˚44’ LN-5˚37’; 10˚06’ LE-9˚94’ and 10˚06’-9˚85’ at an altitude of 1392 m-1396 m.

Animal material

360 male and female post fingerlings of Clarias jaensis with average weight and average total length of 97 ± 9 g and 24 ± 1,5 cm were captured from those in the natural environment of Santchou and stocked in a breeding pond at the study site. The fish were acclimatized for two weeks in 1 m3 concrete tanks previously. During this period, they were fed ad libitum with a standard diet (3A) containing 40% of protein and consisting of wheat bran, soybean meal, and fishmeal [7].

Experimental diet

Four isoproteic experimental diets were formulated with different energy levels 13.75 MJ/kg, 14.04 MJ/kg; 15.82 MJ/kg, and 16.11 MJ/kg of food (Table 1). The chosen energy levels refer to those of Clarias gariepinus and the principal source of energy was palm oil. The chemical compositions of different diets were analyzed by method [11].

Energy level (MJ/kg)
Ingredients (g/Kg) 13.75 14.04 15.82 16.11
Maize 280 245 225 203
Wheat bran 60 51 35 38
Cottonseed cake 15 13 10 15
Soybean meal 30 44 60 45
Fish meal 567 570 565 570
Shell meal 1 1 1 1
Bone meal 1 1 1 1
Palm oil 26 55 83 107
Premix 2% 20 20 20 20
Total 1000 1000 1000 1000
Chemical composition
Crude protein (%) 39.76 ± 0.49 40.06 ± 0.75 40.66 ± 0.37 40.56 ± 0.50
Crude energy (MJ/kg)
(kcal/kg)
13.75 ± 0.10 14.04 ± 0.16 15.82 ± 0.09 16.11 ± 0,11
Crude lipid (%) 7.00 ± 0.00 11.33 ± 0.28 12.00 ± 0.00 15.33 ± 0.57
Ash (%) 2,93 ± 0.05 1.96 ± 0.05 2.70 ± 0.17 2.06 ± 0.05

Table 1: Composition of expérimental diets.

Fish were randomly divided into four comparable groups repeated 3 times with 15 males and 15 females per repetition. Each group was randomly assigned to one of the experimental rations R1 (13.75 MJ/kg), R2 (14.04 MJ/kg), R3 (15.82 MJ/kg) and R4 (16.11 MJ/kg).

The trial was conducted in 12 polystyrene happas of 1 m3 (like cages), built in a pond of 100 m² area and depth 0.90 m. This pond consists of a water inlet and outlet pipe and was filled with water from a lake located 150 m away. Note that the happas were cleaned 3 time per week to facilitate the flow of water and therefore, the renewal of water inside the happas. The food was served in a circular floating frame placed on the surface of the water of each happa, distributed twice a day (8 am and 6 pm) in pellet form and representing 3% of the ichtyobiomasse. Below the floating frame was placed a bowl to collect uneaten food. 20% of fish from each group were randomly taken each month and the total length were measure using an ichtyometer. Also, fish sample were weighed individually using SF-400 balance (1 g precision) to evaluate growth characteristics and adjust the amount of food to distribute. Uneaten food were collected every day, sun-dried, and weighed to estimate feed consumption. The physico-chemical parameters of the water (temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH) were measured weekly and are summarized in Table 2.

Mean Temperature pH Oxygen
21,48 ± 0,71 6,70 ± 1,04 3,61 ± 2,57

Table 2: Physico-chemical characteristics of pond water.

At the end of the experiment, 24 fish from each group were sacrificed to determine the chemical and biochemical composition of their carcasses.

Percent survival and growth characteristics

Percent survival (%)

sr=fn/in × 100

fn: Final number of fish,

in: Initial number of fish

Food Consumption (g)

FC=Fd-Re

FC: Feed consumption,

Fd: Food distributed,

Re: Refusal

Weight gain (g)

wg=wf-wi

Wg: Weight gain,

Wf: Final weight,

Wi: Initial weight

Average daily gain= (g.d-1)

ADg=wg⁄T

ADg: Average daily gain,

Wg: Weight gain (g),

T: Duration of the assay (day)

Specific growth rate (%. d-1)

SGR=[ln(wf)-ln(wi)]x100/T

SGR: Specific Growth Rate,

wf: Final weight,

wi: Initial weight,

T: Duration of the assay (day)

Consumption Index (CI)

CI=FC⁄wg

FC: Food Consumption,

Wg: Weight gain

Chemical and biochemical composition of the carcass

The dry matter content was determined after drying in an oven at 105˚C for 24 hours. Protein, lipid and ash content was determined by the method [11].

5 g of flesh of each fish was dilacerated and diluted in 5% of physiological saline (NaCl) and centrifuged at 5000 rev/ minute. The homogenate obtained was used to determine total cholesterol, HDLC (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol), and TGS (Triglycerides), according to the method described in the notice of kit. Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDLC) was obtained using the following formula: LDLC=Total Cholesterol- (HDLC+TGS/5).

Statistical analysis

The data on growth characteristics were subjected to two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (sex and energy level) and that of chemical and biochemical analysis of the carcass to one-way ANOVA (energy level). When there were significant differences between the means, they were separated by the Duncan test at 5% significance level. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used for these analyses.

Results

The effects of energy level on percent survival and growth characteristics are shown in Table 3 and illustrated by Figures 1-3. It appears that, except the percent survival and K factor, the growth characteristics were significantly affected by the energy level (P<0.05).

Energy level (MJ/kg)
Growth characteristics         13.75          14.04      15.82 16.11 P
FC (g) 355.11 ± 2.66a 360.61 ± 12.64a 375.93 ± 17.17b 390.98 ± 5.27c 0.00
LW (g)
   ♀ 214.00 ± 37.93Aa 214.00 ± 17.51Aa 186.13 ± 35.21Aab 181.00 ± 18.42Ab 0.03
   ♂          197.75 ± 37.87Aa 263.00 ± 29.70Bb 206.61 ± 33.14Aa 194.50 ± 10.00Aa 0.00
   ♂♀       203.60 ± 37.94a 244.41 ± 35.08b 200.31 ± 34.45a 190.39 ± 14.18a 0.00
TL (cm)
    ♀ 28.72 ± 1.30Aa 28.63 ± 0.71Aa 27.56 ± 1.74Aab 27.21 ± 1.60 Ab 0.06
    ♂             28.71 ± 3.69Aa 32.63 ± 0.85Bb 30.55 ± 1.89 Bc  29.43 ± 0.83 Bca 0.00
    ♂♀       28.72 ± 3.01a 31.12 ± 2.12b 29.63 ± 2.29 a 28.76 ± 1.50 a 0.00
WG (g)
     ♀ 122.33 ± 38.58 Aa 123.36 ± 22.83Aa 94.12 ± 35.69 Aab 88.57 ± 23.85 Ab 0.04
     ♂        96.36 ± 40.03 Aa 160.27 ± 32.17Bb 103.88 ± 36.46 Aa 92.25 ± 12.47 Aa 0.00
     ♂♀       105.71 ± 40.74a 146.27 ± 33.86b 100.88 ± 35.80a 91.13 ± 16.25a 0.00
ADG (g)
      ♀ 0.90 ± 0.28 Aa 0.91 ± 0.16Aa 0.69 ± 0.26 Aab 0.65 ± 0.17 Ab 0.04
      ♂        0.71 ± 0.29 Aa 1.18 ± 0.23Bb 0.76 ± 0.27 Aa 0.68 ± 0.09 Aa 0.00
      ♂♀       0.78 ± 0.30a 1.08 ± 0.25b 0.74 ± 0.26a 0.67 ± 0.12a 0.00
CI 3.35 ± 1.00a 2.61 ± 0.71b 4.34 ± 1.95c 4.43 ± 0.88c 0.00
SGR (%)
     ♀ 0.62 ± 0.14 Aa 0.63 ± 0.11Aa 0.51 ± 0.15 Aa 0.49 ± 0.13 Aa 0.09
     ♂         0.48 ± 0.16 Aa 0.69 ± 0.10Bb 0.50 ± 0.15 Aa 0.47 ± 0.06 Aa 0.00
     ♂♀         0.53 ± 0.17a 0.67 ± 0.11b 0.51 ± 0.15a 0.48 ± 0.08a 0.00
K (%)        
     ♀ 0.89 ± 0.08 Aa 0.91 ± 0.04 Aa 0.88 ± 0.10 Aa 0.90 ± 0.09 Aa 0.91
     ♂         0.76 ± 0.10 Ba 0.75 ± 0.05Ba 0.72 ± 0.06Ba 0.76 ± 0.03Ba 0.25
   ♂♀ 0.81 ± 0.11 a 0.81 ± 0.09 a 0.77 ± 0.10 a 0.80 ± 0.08 a 0.46
Note : a, b and c: The means with the same tiny letter in the same line are not significantly different (P>0.05); A and B: The means with the same capital letter in the same column are not significantly different (P>0.05); P=Probability, LW=Live Weight, TL=Total Length, FC=Feed Consumption, WG=Weight Gain, ADG=Average Daily Gain; CI=Consumption index, SGR=Specific Growth Rate, K=Condition factor.

Table 3: Growth characteristics of post-fingerling Clarias jaensis in function of energy level.

As shown in Figure 1, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in percent survival between the four diets. However, the highest percent survival (84.86% ± 3.26%) was obtained with the ration containing 14.04 MJ/kg and the lowest (77.6% ± 4.68%) was obtained with the ration containing 16.11 MJ/kg of energy.

Aquaculture-survival

Figure 1: Effect of energy level on percent survival of post-fingerling Clarias jaensis

The feed consumption of fish that received the ration containing 16.11 MJ/kg of energy were significantly (P<0.05) higher. On the other hand, those who received rations at 13.75 followed by 14.04 MJ/kg of energy, recorded the lowest feed consumption and were comparable (Table 2).

Live weights of females receiving energy levels of 13.75 MJ/kg and 14.04 MJ/kg were significantly higher (P<0.05) compared to those who received higher energy levels (Table 3). However, in males, this characteristic were significantly (P<0.05) higher only in the group fed at 14.04 MJ/kg and lower in the ration containing 16.11 MJ/ kg of energy. In addition, males in the group fed at 14.04 MJ/kg showed significantly higher (P<0.05) live weight than females. The same result was observed in the group receiving 15.82 MJ/kg and 16.11 MJ/kg, although there was no significant difference (P>0.05). However, the reverse has been observed in fish fed at 13.75 MJ/kg of energy. Irrespective of sex, live weight was significantly (P<0.05) higher at 14.04 MJ/kg and lower at 16.11/kg. Figures 2A-2C show the monthly variation of live weight of males, females, and both sexes. In males and both sexes combined, the weight of the fish was higher in the group 14.04 MJ/kg from the third month until the end of the test. However, in females, the weight was higher in the 13.75 MJ/kg group from the same period to the end, while at 14.04 MJ/kg it tended to increase towards the end of the test.

Aquaculture-evolution

Figure 2: Monthly evolution of live weight of male (A), female (B), and the both sex (C) of post-fingerlings Clarias jaensis in function of energy level.
Note: (Equation ): 13.75 MJ/kg; (Equation ): 14.04 MJ/kg; (Equation ):15.82 MJ/kg; (Equation):16.11 MJ/kg

In males, females, and sex combined, weight gain and mean daily gain were significantly (P<0.05) higher in group fed at 14.04 MJ/kg than in the other groups (Table 3). However, they were lower with rations containing 16.11 MJ/kg of energy. However, regardless of the characteristics considered, males had significantly high values in the 14.04 MJ/kg group compared with females. Similar results were observed in the group fed at 15.82 MJ/kg and 16.11 MJ/kg but were not significant (P>0.05). The reverse was recorded with the group fed at 13.75 MJ/kg.

Total fish length was significantly (P<0.05) affected by energy levels. In fact, in the group that received 14.04 MJ/kg, females, males, and both sexes combined had higher total lengths compared to other groups (Table 3). As well as weight gain and average daily gain, total length was significantly higher in males compared to females in the same group and in the group fed at 15.82 MJ/kg and 16.11 MJ/kg.

The consumption index was significantly affected by the energy level (P<0.05). The lowest value of the consumption index was recorded in the group that received the ration at 14.04 MJ/kg followed by 13.75 MJ/kg and the highest was recorded in the group that received the highest energy level (Table 3).

In males, females, and both sexes combined, the specific growth rate was also higher (P<0.05) with diets containing 14.04 MJ/ kg and lower in the group receiving 16.11 MJ/kg (Table 3). This characteristic was significantly higher in females compared to males in all groups except the one fed at 14.04 MJ/kg where the difference was significant (P<0.05).

Figures 3A-3C show the monthly variation of the K factor. This characteristic was greater at the end of the trial in males and for both sexes combined.

Aquaculture-factor

Figure 3: Monthly evolution of K factor of female (A), male (B), and both sexes (C) of post fingerlings Clarias jaensis in function of energy level Note: (Equation ): 13.75 MJ/kg; (Equation ): 14.04 MJ/kg; (Equation ):15.82 MJ/kg; ( Equation):16.11 MJ/kg

Whatever the sex, the energy level did not significantly affect the K factor, but it was greater in the group fed at 13.75 and 14.04 MJ/ kg (Table 3). The high value of K factor was registered in the group fed at 14.04 MJ/kg for females and 13.75 MJ/kg and 16.11 MJ/kg for males. However, there was no significant difference (P>0.05). Moreover, whatever the level of energy, females had a significant high K factor than males.

The effect of the energy level on the chemical composition of the carcass is shown in Table 4. In general, it is apparent that, all characteristics were significantly affected by the energy level of the diet (P<0.05), except for the ash content. The lipid content increased significantly with the increasing energy level of the ration. The lowest dry matter and ash contents were recorded in the group fed with the ration containing 13.75 MJ/kg of energy and the highest values were observed in fish fed at 14.04 MJ/kg. The high protein levels were obtained in the group that received rations at 14.04 MJ/kg and the low value was registered with the energy level 15.82 MJ/kg followed by 16.11 MJ/kg.

Energy level (MJ/kg)
Chemical characteristics (%) 3000 3100         3200 3300 P
Dry matter 27.51 ± 0.56a 31.63 ± 1.55b 29.60 ± 1.40c 31.21 ± 1.10b 0.000
Ash 3.90 ± 0.57 a 4.03 ± 0.72 a 4.01 ± 0.52 a 3.95 ± 0.42 a 0.276
Proteins 19.3 ± 0.16ab 20.89 ± 0.77a 18.14 ± 1.42b 18.30 ± 1.42b 0.031
Lipids 3.9 ± 1.29a 5.81 ± 0.56a 6.55 ± 1.68ab 8.31 ± 0.14b 0.008
Note : a, b and c: The means with the same letter on the same line are not significantly different (P>0.05); P=Probability.

Table 4: Chemical composition of Clarias jaensis Carcass in function of energy level.

The effect of energy level on cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and TGS is summarized in Table 5. It appears that the energy level did not significantly affect these characteristics (P>0.05). Nevertheless, cholesterol was lower at 13.75 MJ/kg as LDL and triglycerides, and higher at 16.11 MJ/kg, while LDL and triglyceride was higher in fish fed at 15.82 MJ/kg. However, the group receiving 13.75 MJ/kg recorded higher HDL and the lowest were observed at 15.82 MJ/ kg of energy.

Energy level (MJ/kg)
Biochemical characteristics (mg/dl)    13.75    14.04    15.82    16.11 P
Cholesterol 10.77 ± 1.54 10.85 ± 2.63 11.73 ± 2.34 12,88 ± 3.44 0.44
LDL 2.00 ± 1.54 3.09 ± 0.79 4.35 ± 2.88 4,17 ± 1.40 0.09
HDL 4.43 ± 2.01 4.00 ± 0.60 3.51 ± 0.91 3.82 ± 1.36 0.61
TGS 25.03 ± 4.31 26.12 ± 5.85 31.48 ± 9.83 28.94 ± 7.86 0.28
Note: LDL=Low Density Lipoprotein, HDL=High Density Lipoprotein, TGS=Triglycerides, P=Probability

Table 5: Biochemical parameters of Clarias jaensis Carcass in function of energy level.

Discussion

Percent survival ranged from 77.6% to 84.86% and was comparable in all diets. But, the low value was registered with the high energy level. We don’t have information on the effect of energy level on the survival of post-fingerling fish. However, the low percent survival in fish receiving the most energy could be explained by the low digestibility of the excess of lipids in their diet. Indeed, at low temperature, as was the case in this study, digestibility in fish is not good. The poorly-eaten food could rot and cause swelling of the belly and death of the fish. Our results show that the best growth characteristics were obtained in the fish receiving the ration containing 14.04 MJ/kg of energy compared to other rations. The increase in energy level leads to a significant increase in feed consumption (P<0.05) and the highest is obtained with the ration that contains the most energy (16.11 MJ/kg). According to this result, the high level of energy in the ration will improve its palatability, which does not corroborate that of Clarias gariepinus, whose food consumption decreases with increasing energy consumption [12]. This difference could be attributed to the use of palm oil in the formulation of our experimental food. Indeed, the inclusion of oil in the food improves food consumption [13]. Most studies have reported that the decrease in growth of fish fed on diet with excessive fat would result from the inability of fish to digest and use the excess energy provided by fat [14].

The consumption index was significantly affected by the energy level and was better with the ration containing 14.04 MJ/kg. This ration was better valued compared to the one containing the most energy (16.11 MJ/kg), although this one was the most consumed. In fact, the excess of energy would improve the feed consumption without favoring a good digestion of the food. This result is different from those of Memis D and El-Dakar who found that the best consumption index is obtained in fish that receive more energy in their diet [15,16]. This difference would be explained by the species and size of the fish used in their study.

Live weight, total length, weight gain, average daily gain, and specific growth rate varied significantly (P<0.05) with energy level. Independently of sex, these characteristics were higher with the diet containing 14.04 MJ/kg and lower with the one containing the highest energy level (16.11 MJ/kg). These results are contrary to those of on rainbow trout fed with three types of food containing different energy levels [15]. These authors observed that the weight, total length, K factor and specific growth rate were better with the food containing the most energy. We attribute this result contradiction to the type of species and the quality of food used. On the other hand, reported that the growth characteristics of postfingerling Clarias gariepinus are better with the ration containing 13.75 MJ/kg digestible energy and 40% protein [12]. This result does not agree with ours, not because of the type of food, but probably because of the species used [17]. Indeed, their main sources of energy were palm oil and maize as in our study.

In the present study, except the K factor, the growth characteristics of males were in general significantly higher than those of females in the diets containing 14.04 MJ/kg, 15.82 MJ/kg, and 16.11 MJ/ kg and the opposite was observed with the ration containing the lowest level of energy (13.75 MJ/kg). This variation in weight may be due to the sexual dimorphism that appears in adult Claridae. However, the males and females with the best growth performance were obtained with the ration containing 14.04 MJ/kg. Similar results have been reported, after giving diets with different energy levels (10.87 MJ/kg to 15.08 MJ/kg) to Clarias gariepinus, had obtained a decrease in weight from the lowest energy level to the highest level [18]. The weight of males was also higher than the one of the females. On the other hand, had rather observed an increasing weight and total length of males and females of Rhamdia quelen with increasing energy levels [19]. It should be noted that these differences in results are not only related to the species, but to the quality of the food because in our study, palm oil was used as the main energy source, whereas the other works used soybean oil. It could be said that the presence of palm oil in Clarias jaensis food would reduce its digestibility.

The maximum value of the average daily gain (1.08 g/day) obtained in this study is less than 2.26 g/day reported by in hybrid catfish (Heterobranchus longifilis × Clarias gariepinus) and 3 g/day obtained by in Clarias gariepinus [7,20]. This could be justified by the physico-chemical characteristics of the water that were not within the range recommended for breeding of Claridae. In fact, the feed consumption is a function of temperature and oxygen and the maximal consumption of catfish is obtained at 34˚C [21]. For a better digestion and growth of catfish, it is important to have a temperature comprised between 27.5˚C-32.5˚C [22].

The K factor was comparable between treatments but significantly lower in males compared to females in all diets except for the one containing the least energy. This factor was less than 1 in all fish groups and according to, this result indicates that the fish were in poor physical condition during the test [23].

Except the ash, the energy level significantly affected the chemical characteristics of the carcass (P<0.05). Dry matter, protein and ash were better with the ration which contains 14.04 MJ/kg compared to the other groups. Since this ration was the most valorized by fish, it has led to better tissue development. These results do not corroborate those of who found that it is rather the food containing the most energy that has recorded the highest values of these characteristics except protein [15]. In addition, the lipid content has increased with increasing energy level which is similar to the results of the same author. These results also corroborate those of and in which the lipid content of the carcass of fish increases with the energy level of the diet [24,25]. However, these results are different from those reported by in which the increase in energy level in the diet had no significant effect on the lipid content of the carcass [26]. This difference could be explained by the use of palm oil in the formulation of our rations because the increase of the palm oil content in the diet generally leads to an increase of lipid deposits in the adipose tissue [27].

The biochemical composition of the Clarias jaensis carcass did not significantly vary with energy level. However, the lowest cholesterol, LDL, TGS, and high HDL concentrations were observed in fish with the lowest energy level (13.75 MJ/kg, followed by 14.04 MJ/kg). Fish fed the diet with the most energy have a high concentration of cholesterol and especially LDL (bad cholesterol) in their flesh. Note that fish is generally appreciated because it contains omegas 3 and 6, useful for health. However, the quality and quantity of its diet could promote the deposit of bad cholesterol, which is not good for the consumer.

Conclusion

Except the percent survival and K factor, the energy level has significantly affected the other growth characteristics. The highest feed consumption was obtained with the ration containing the most energy (16.11 MJ/kg). The best consumption index, weight, total length, weight gain, mean daily gain, and specific growth rate were significantly higher with the diet containing 14.04 MJ/kg. The energy level had a non-significant effect on the biochemical composition of the carcass but a significant effect on the chemical composition apart from the ash, who was higher at 14.04 MJ/kg as dry matter and proteins. Lipids were higher in the ration containing the most energy. This study showed that the optimal energy level for the growth of Clarias jaensis post fingerlings is 14.04 MJ/kg kcal/kg.

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the authors mentioned in the header for their different contribution in this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

Citation: Gwladys TKS, Amidou KN, Peguy TA, Ronald KN, Christelle GTT, Narcisse VB, et al. (2023) Survival, Growth Response, Chemical and Biochemical Characteristics of the Carcass of Clarias jaensis (Boulenger, 1909) Post Fingerlings Fed Various Dietary Energy. J Aquac Res Dev.14:777.

Copyright: © 2023 Gwladys TKS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.