Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Survey and Identification of Plant Parasitic Nematodes on Faba bean Crop in Ethiopia

Belay Feyisa^* Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia
^*Correspondence: Belay Feyisa, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ambo Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia, Tel: + 251913443837, Fax: +251-112362325, Email:

Received: 16-Apr-2021 Published: 30-Jun-2021, DOI: 10.35248/2157-7471.21.12.561

Introduction

Faba bean (Vicia fabae L.) is the major cool season food legumes produced in Ethiopia next to cereals. It serves as major source of protein and income. The crop also fixes atmospheric nitrogen and improves soil fertility. However, the productivity of faba bean in Ethiopia is still, far below its potential due to a number of factors. Among which diseases are the most important biotic factors causing faba bean yield reduction [1]. An average national productivity is 1.5 tons ha^-1, while world average grain yield of faba bean is around 1.8 t ha ^-1 [2]. Pests and diseases of pulses have long been recognized as important constraints to pulses production worldwide and have received extensive research. However, plant parasitic nematodes have remained largely excluded from research attention. Data on the importance of nematodes, particularly individual species occurrence and community composition, population densities and pathogenicity are insufficient. Phytonematode caused considerable injure and losses to different agricultural crops all over the world [3]. Survey studies of such pest play an important role in update economic thresholds for economic crops such as faba bean infection. Pest survey is a vital element of plant quarantine that affords early detection of pest attack, so that their further spread is limited, and timely measures may use for their suppression. Therefore, the present survey was carried-out to determine the plant parasitic nematode genera associated with two important regions of faba bean crops at Oromia and Amhara.

Materials and Methods

One hundred twenty soil and root samples were obtained from maize plants within rhizosphere zone, for the period of the growing season of 2018-2019. The samples represented two regions i.e., Oromia and Amhara. Samples were obtained by digging the soil to a distance downward of about 15 cm-30 cm from the rhizosphere of the maize plants in a systematic, zigzag-sampling pattern of each field. Composite Soil samples of about one kg and 200 g of adventitious roots were positioned in plastic bags and transported directly to the laboratory of nematology at Ambo Agricultural Research Center and reserved in the refrigerator at 4°C awaiting extraction of nematodes [4]. Nematode extraction from soil samples was done by sieving and modified Baermann tray method [5]. Identification of nematode genera in frequent aliquots (1 ml/ each) in each soil sample was depended on the morphological characters of the nematode forms according to Mai and Lyon [6]. Plant parasitic nematode genera were identified at the generic level [7], and counted using Peter’s 1-ml eelworm counting slide under a compound microscope. Nematodes were also extracted from roots using a modified maceration and filtration technique according to Hooper et al. [8] and thereafter enumerated and identified to genus levels at various magnifications as described earlier. Nematode specimens from each sample were mounted on glass slides for identification to genus/species level following keys and references of Siddiqi and Mekete et al. [9,10] under a light microscope.

Data Collection

Populations of Nematode numbers were expressed as the number of nematodes J²/100 cm³ soil or J2/10 g fresh root weight (FRW) were determined. The prominence value (PV) was calculated as: absolute density × √absolute frequency of occurrence/10 [11]. Frequency is expressed as the number of sites where a genus occurred. Genera were considered widespread when they occurred in more than 30% of the sites. A genus whose mean density was more than 10 individuals/100 g of root was considered abundant [12,13].

Results and Discussion

All one hundred twenty soils and root samples were collected from the roots and rhizosphere of faba bean plants, through the growing season of 2018. A total of six (6) genera of plant parasitic nematodes belonging to six (6) families were identified from the soil and the root samples in the two regions (Table 1).

Table 1: Plant parasitic nematodes Plant parasitic nematodes genera isolated from soils and roots of fababean in two regions.

These nematode genera were Pratylenchus, Rotylenchulus, Tylenchoryhnchus, Xiphinema, Ditylenchus and Tylenchus. Data in Table 2 showed that Xiphinema and Ditylenchus genera alike to be the widespread nematode pests as they occurred at the rates of 14 and 8 times with percent occurrence of 12 and 7%, correspondingly. Furthermore, the two nematode genera Tylenchorynchus and Tylenchus showed modest distributions as they occurred at the same rates of 6 times with percent occurrence of 5% respectively. The genera Rotylenchulus was fewer widespread as they occurred at the rate of 2 times with percent occurrence of 2%.

Table 2: Frequency of occurrence of plant parasitic nematode genera on fababean crop.

The PV of Xiphinema (59), Rotylenchulus (35) and Ditylenchus (34) was higher from soil samples. The highest PV were recorded pratylenchus (17) followed by Ditylenchus (11) and Tylenchorhynchus (9) from root samples (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2) below. Three nematode genera were present in both fababean roots and soils, namely: Ditylenchus (bulb and stem), Pratylenchus (lesion), and Tylenchorhynchus (stunt). The general population density of PPN genera in roots of fababean ranged from 75 to 100 per 10 g of dry roots with Pratylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus having significantly higher population density of 100 individual per 10 g of roots compared to the other genera. Although Ditylenchus spp. (75) were present in lower numbers with an average density of less. When the populations of different PPN genera in soil were evaluated for all mentioned regions, the population density ranged from 60 to 250 nematodes per 100 g of dry soil (Table 3). Rotylenchulus had a high mean density of 250 nematodes/100g soil. The predominant genera present were Xiphinema, Ditylenchus and Tylenchus across all the regions. The highest PV was recorded from Xiphinema (59) and Rotylenchulus (35) followed by Ditylenchus (34) from soil samples. The PV of Pratylenchus (17) and Ditylenchus (11) followed by Tylenchorhynchus (9) were calculated from root samples (Table 3). The altitude of the sampled areas ranged from 2176-3086 (Oromia) to 2622-3043 m (Amhara) region above sea level.

Figure 1: Map showing the major Fababean growing districts in Ethiopia, from which root and soil samples were collected during the 2018-2019 growing season.

Figure 2: The plant parasitic nematode abundance, frequency and prominence value from root and soil samples in all 2 major fababean growing regions of Ethiopia, during the 2018-2019 growing season.

Table 3: Prominence value (PV), frequency of occurrence (FO) and abundance of predominant plant-parasitic nematodes recovered from soils and roots of faba bean (viciafabae. L).

All 6 nematode genera except Rotylenchulus and Tylenchorhynchus were found in Oromia region (Table 4). Among that the highest population of nematode was Xiphinema (2400). Rotylenchulus nematode is the only nematode recorded from Oromia region. Ditylenchus (1800) and Pratylenchus (800) followed by Tylenchus (700) were the highest nematode population found in both regions respectively. The highest nematode population found in the Amhara region was Ditylenchus (800) followed by Tylenchus and Xiphinema (500) respectively. The highest nematode population found in the Oromia and Amhara was Xiphinema (173/100 cm³) and Ditylenchus (400/100 cm³) of soil respectively. Xiphinema was highly distributed in the surveyed region (Figure 1).

Table 4: Occurrence of plant-parasitic nematode genera in soil and root samples from 2 major faba bean growing regions of, Ethiopia, during the 2018 growing season.

The present study reported the presence of six of plant parasitic nematodes genera belonging to 3 families, found associated with the rhizosphere of faba bean crops at two regions, Oromia and Amhara. Among the six phytonematode genera, Xiphinema and Ditylenchus genera seemed to be the prevailing nematode pests as they occurred at the rates of 14 and 8 times with percent occurrence of 12% and 7%, respectively. Moreover, the nematode genera, Tylenchorhynchus and Tylenchus showed modest distributions as they occurred at the same rates of 6 times with percent occurrence of 5%, whereas, the genera, Dotylenchulus shows less frequent as they occurred at the rate of 2 times with percent occurrence of 5%. Pulse crops such as peas, chickpeas, faba (fava) bean (Vicia faba L.), and lentils are among the plants that Ditylenchus dipsaci can parasitize or is associated with [14,15]. In Ethiopia, many pests, including nematodes, have been reported as production constraints of cereal, pulse and oil crops [16]. Several species of PPN belonging to 15 genera are reported to be associated with cereals, pulses and oil crops in Ethiopia [17].

However, the economic importance of these nematodes in relation to yield loss and their impact on national production of these crops still remains unknown.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Plant parasitic nematodes occur in faba bean based faming systems in Ethiopia. Higher occurrence and density of major nematode pests such as Xiphinema and Ditylenchus may constrain faba bean production in the country. There is need to establish the economic importance of the reported nematodes in Ethiopia as well as continued search for an effective Plant Parasitic Nematode management strategy in faba bean based cropping systems. The study indicated that plantparasitic nematodes have a large impact on pulse crop production. The occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes in pulse farming systems needs to be investigated further, and the reaction of these nematodes on cultural practices would provide valuable information for management routines.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge Alemnesh Zinaye for her unreserved support of laboratory facilities. The author also thanks Belgium University and Jimma University for their collaboration for they give me deep training on nematode extraction and identification.

REFERENCES

1. Yohannes D. Faba bean (Vicia faba) in Ethiopia. Institute of Biodiversity, Conservation and Research (IBCR). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2000:43.
2. ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dryland Areas). Impact of improved faba bean technologies in Africa No-2. 2008.
3. Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. eds. 2005.
4. Talwana HL, Butseya MM, Tusime G. Occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes and factors that enhance population build-up in cereal-based cropping systems in Uganda. Afr Crop Sci J. 2008;16(2).
5. Goodey T. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Technical Bulletin. MAF. 1949(2).
6. Mai WF, Lyon HH. Pictorial key to genera of plant parasitic nematodes. 4th ed. Cornell University Press. 1975. 
7. Marinari-Palmisano, A, Vinciguerram T. Classification of hematodes. In: Ambrogioni L, d’Errico FP, Greco N, Marinari-Palmisano A, Roversi PF, (Eds.), General and applied agricultural nematology. Italian Society of Nematology, (Florence). 2014:23-41.
8. Hooper DJ, Hallmann J, Subbotin S. Methods for extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge (2nd edn). Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. CAB International. 2005;53-86.
9. Siddiqi MR. Tylenchida: Parasites of plants and insects. (2nd edn). CABI Publishing. 2006;833.
10. Mekete T, Dababat A, Sekora N, Akyazi F, Abebe E. Identifcation key for agriculturally important plant-parasitic nematodes: A manual for nematology. International Nematode Diagnosis and Identification. CIMMYT. 2012;39.
11. De Waele D, McDonald AH. Diseases caused by nematodes. In: Frederiksen RA, Odvody GN (eds). Compendium of Sorghum diseases. (2nd edn). American Phytopathological Society. 2000;50-53.
12. Adikom A. Plant parasitic nematodes associated with plantain, Musa paradisiaca(AAB), in the Ivory Coast. Revue du Nematologie. 1988;11:109-113.
13. Kashaija IN, Speijer PR, Gold CS, Gowen SR. Occurrence, distribution and abundance of plant parasitic nematodes of bananas in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal. 1994;2: 99-104.
14. Singh SK, Hodda M, Ash GJ. Plant-parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses. EPPO Bulletin. 2013;43:334–374.
15. Pokharel R, Marahatta SP, Handoo ZA, Chitwood DJ. Nematode community structures in different deciduous tree fruits and grape in Colorado, USA and impact of organic peach and apple production practices. Eur J Soil Biol. 2015;67: 59–68.
16. Abate T, Negasi F. A review of grain legume pest management research in Ethiopia. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa. 1985:327-344.
17. Tegegne G, Abebe F, Hussien T, Tilahun T, Belete E, Ayalew M, et al. Review of maize, sorghum and millet pathology research. In: Tadesse A. (Ed.) Increasing crop production through improved plant protection. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia. 2008;245-302.