Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences

Membership in Social Groups: Impacts on Identity, Exclusion, and Focus

Matthew James^* Department of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
^*Correspondence: Matthew James, Department of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA, Email:

Received: 28-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. GJISS-23-23630 ; Editor assigned: 30-Aug-2023, Pre QC No. GJISS-23-23630 (PQ); Reviewed: 13-Sep-2023, QC No. GJISS-23-23630 ; Revised: 20-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. GJISS-23-23630 (PQ); Published: 27-Sep-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2319-8834.23.12.065

Description

Membership in various social groups and communities is an integral part of human social life. However, membership isn't always straightforward, as it can involve complex dynamics of social inclusion and exclusion [1]. Moreover, how individuals handle these dynamics is closely linked to their regulatory focus, which transforms their motivations, goals, and behaviors. In this article, we explore the intricate relationship between membership status, social exclusion, and regulatory focus on our social experiences.

Our membership in different social groups has a deep impact on our social identity [2]. According to social identity theory, individuals categorize themselves and others into groups based on shared characteristics. This categorization results in an "ingroup" vs. "out-group" distinction and significantly influences our self-concept.

Additionally, these group memberships play an essential role in children's testimonial learning [3]. Children often learn from others in their social groups, such as peers or family members [4]. Group membership can enhance the credibility of a testimonial source, making children more likely to trust and learn from someone within their social group. Conversely, exclusion from a group can lead to doubt regarding information provided by those outside the group.

Social exclusion can be a challenging aspect of membership status [5]. It occurs when individuals are treated as outsiders or face rejection within their groups. This exclusion can lead to feelings of isolation and reduced self-esteem [6]. It's essential to recognize that social exclusion can have a detrimental impact on an individual's well-being.

Regulatory focus theory provides valuable insights into how individuals respond to membership status and social exclusion. This theory distinguishes between two primary regulatory foci: Promotion and prevention. Individuals with a promotion focus are driven by aspirations, achievements, and potential gains. They seek growth, advancement, and the fulfillment of their goals. Promotion-focused individuals are more likely to take risks and engage in activities that maximize positive outcomes.

Conversely, individuals with a prevention focus are concerned with safety, security, and avoiding losses or negative outcomes. They tend to be risk-averse, emphasizing the maintenance of the status quo and the avoidance of potential failures.

Membership status and regulatory focus

An individual's membership status can significantly influence their regulatory focus. Those who feel a strong sense of belonging within their groups may adopt a promotion focus, driven by the desire to excel and achieve goals within their group context. On the other hand, individuals facing social exclusion or uncertainty in their membership may develop a prevention focus, emphasizing the importance of avoiding mistakes and maintaining their position within the group [7].

Social exclusion and regulatory focus

Social exclusion can shift an individual's regulatory focus as well. When individuals experience rejection or exclusion, they are more likely to adopt a prevention focus as they seek to protect their self-esteem and avoid further negative experiences. This shift can lead to risk aversion and reluctance to engage in new opportunities or challenges [8].

The role of regulatory focus in coping

Regulatory focus also plays an essential role in how individuals cope with social exclusion. Promotion-focused individuals may respond to exclusion by seeking alternative groups or strategies to achieve their goals, while prevention-focused individuals may attempt to conform more closely to group norms to regain acceptance. These coping strategies can impact an individual's well-being and the dynamics within the group [9]. Understanding the interplay between membership status, social exclusion, and regulatory focus has several implications for research and practical applications.

Implications of the study

Longitudinal studies: Researchers can conduct longitudinal studies to examine how changes in membership status and experiences of social exclusion influence individuals' regulatory focus over time [10].

Group dynamics: Investigating how group dynamics, leadership styles, and inclusion initiatives impact regulatory focus can provide valuable insights into mitigating the negative effects of social exclusion.

Practical applications

Workplace inclusion: Organizations can use this knowledge to develop inclusive workplace practices that help employees maintain a promotion focus, raising creativity and innovation.

Educational settings: Schools and universities can implement programs to prevent social exclusion, ensuring that students can maintain a promotion focus on their academic and personal growth.

Personal development: Individuals can use this understanding to recognize and adapt their regulatory focus in response to changing social dynamics, leading to more effective coping strategies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, membership status, social exclusion, and regulatory focus are interconnected factors that significantly influence an individual's self-concept, behavior, and well-being. Understanding the complex interplay between these elements can help researchers, practitioners, and individuals navigate the challenges of group dynamics and social interactions. By promoting a promotion focus and taking care of inclusive environments, we can empower individuals to advance within their respective groups while mitigating the negative effects of social exclusion.

References

1. Cooley S, Elenbaas L, Killen M. Social exclusion based on group membership is a form of prejudice. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;51:103-29.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Yu Y, Zhang Y. The impact of social identity conflict on planning horizons. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023;124(5):917-934.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Li PH, Koenig MA. The roles of group membership and social exclusion in children's testimonial learning. J Exp Child Psychol. 2022;216:105342.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Diesendruck G. Why do children essentialize social groups? Adv Child Dev Behav. 2020;59:31-64.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Nielson L, Wiles J, Anderson A. Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village. J Aging Stud. 2019:49:25-30.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: A scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):129.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Philipp MC, Bernstein MJ, Vanman EJ, Johnston L. Social exclusion enhances affiliative signaling. J Soc Psychol. 2021;161(4):508-518.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Park J, Baumeister RF. Social exclusion causes a shift toward prevention motivation. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2015;56:153-159.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Engen OA, Lindøe PH, Braut GS. Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience. Saf Sci. 2023;161:106079.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Lin X, Li S, Qu C. Social network sites influence recovery from social exclusion: Individual differences in social anxiety. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;75:538-546.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]