Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture & Health Sciences

Increaseasing Yield with Environmental Sustainability in Genetic Engineering for Crop Balancing

Takashi Zaitsu^* Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
^*Correspondence: Takashi Zaitsu, Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, Email:

Received: 31-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. GJBAHS-23-24000; Editor assigned: 02-Nov-2023, Pre QC No. GJBAHS-23-24000(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Nov-2023, QC No. GJBAHS-23-24000; Revised: 23-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. GJBAHS-23-24000(R); Published: 30-Nov-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2319-5584.23.12.207

About the Study

Genetic engineering has played a pivotal role in agriculture, facilitating the development of high-yielding crop varieties. As the global population continues to rise, ensuring food security is paramount. However, the conventional methods of increasing crop yield through genetic modification have raised concerns regarding environmental sustainability. Balancing the imperative to increase yield with the need for responsible environmental practices has become a central challenge in modern agriculture. This article explores how genetic engineering can be harnessed to improve crop yield while maintaining environmental sustainability [1].

Global food production must keep pace with the growing world population. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that by 2050, food production will need to increase by 70% to meet the demands of nearly 10 billion people. This escalating demand places immense pressure on the agricultural sector to enhance crop yield.

Genetic engineering, also known as biotechnology, offers a range of tools to address the challenges associated with increasing crop yield. This technology allows scientists to introduce specific genetic traits into crops to improve their productivity, resilience, and nutritional content [2-5]. However, genetic engineering's potential for increasing yield must be harnessed judiciously to ensure it aligns with environmental sustainability.

• Genetic engineering can be employed to develop droughtresistant crop varieties. These plants have the potential to withstand extended periods of water scarcity, which is a crucial adaptation in a changing climate. By reducing the need for excessive irrigation, genetic engineering can help conserve water resources.

• Enhanced resistance to pests and diseases can reduce the need for chemical pesticides, minimizing environmental damage. Genetic engineering has led to the development of crops with built-in pest resistance, such as Bt cotton and Bt maize, which can significantly reduce the environmental impact of agriculture [6].

• Biofortified crops, genetically modified to contain higher nutrient levels, can address malnutrition issues. By increasing the nutritional value of staple crops, genetic engineering can contribute to better human health, reducing the need for dietary supplements and preventing nutrient deficiencies.

• No-till or reduced tillage farming methods, combined with genetically engineered crop varieties, help protect soil health and reduce erosion. These practices can conserve topsoil and prevent environmental degradation [7-9].

• Genetic engineering can be used to develop crops that fit well into sustainable farming systems, like intercropping or agroforestry. These integrated approaches can promote biodiversity and reduce environmental impact.

To ensure that genetic engineering aligns with environmental sustainability, robust regulatory frameworks are necessary. Government agencies and international organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), should collaborate to establish clear guidelines for the development, testing, and deployment of genetically modified crops. These frameworks should consider environmental impact assessments and longterm monitoring of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) [10].

Incorporating transparency and public engagement is essential to building public trust in genetic engineering for crop balancing. Informed discussions and regulatory decisions should include scientists, farmers, environmentalists, policymakers, and consumers. Transparency helps ensure that the benefits of genetic engineering are shared equitably and that potential risks are adequately mitigated.

Conclusion

Genetic engineering offers a powerful tool to increase crop yield while simultaneously promoting environmental sustainability. By developing crops that are resilient to environmental stressors,resistant to pests and diseases, and rich in nutrients, genetic engineering can contribute to the global effort to feed a growing population. However, responsible and ethical use of this technology. Regulatory frameworks, transparency, and public engagement are essential elements in achieving the delicate balance between increased yield and environmental sustainability in crop genetic engineering. The potential of genetic engineering with these considerations in mind, we can foster a more sustainable and food-secure future for the world.

References

1. Benton D, Stevens MK. The influence of a glucose containing drink on the behavior of children in school. Biol Psychol. 2008;78(3):242-245.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Wang Z, Yang Y, Xiang X, Zhu Y, Men J, He M. Estimation of the normal range of blood glucose in rats. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2010;39(2):133-137.

   [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Liu KF, Niu CS, Tsai JC, Yang CL, Peng WH, Niu HS. Comparison of area under the curve in various models of diabetic rats receiving chronic medication. Arch Med Sci. 2022;18(4):1078-1087.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Pound CM, Blair B, Boctor DL, Casey LM, Critch JN, Farrell C, et al. Energy and sports drinks in children and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health. 2017;22(7):406-410.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Howard MA, Marczinski CA. Acute effects of a glucose energy drink on behavioral control. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;18(6):553.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Chen L, Li X, Chen M, Feng Y, Xiong C (2020) The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc Res 116(6):1097-1100.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Zhi ZL (2020) Epidemiology working group for NCIP epidemic response, chinese center for disease control and prevention. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 41:145-151.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Chen G, Wu DI, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, et al. (2020) Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest 130:2620-2629.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Chen T, Wu DI, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, et al. (2020) Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. Bmj 26;368.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, et al. (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395:1054-1062.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]