Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • ResearchBible
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Scimago
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • Scientific Indexing Services (SIS)
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology

Review Article - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 10

Concerns Involving Nanobiotechnology in Contemporary Vaccines Include Nanobacteria, Nanocarriers, and Nanovaccines
Grisolia Christian*
 
Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Golestan University, Iraq
 
*Correspondence: Grisolia Christian, Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Golestan University, Iraq, Email:

Received: 03-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. jnmnt-22-18582; Editor assigned: 06-Oct-2022, Pre QC No. jnmnt-22-18582; Reviewed: 20-Oct-2022, QC No. jnmnt-22-18582; Revised: 24-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. jnmnt-22-18582; Published: 29-Oct-2022, DOI: 10.35248/2157-7439.22.13.642

Abstract

This review briefly discusses the issues with nanobiotechnology as it relates to the design and creation of novel vaccines using the most well-known nanocarriers, including those made by nature such as bacterial spores, virus-like particles, exosomes, and bacteriophages and by man such as Proteosomes, liposomes, virosomes, SuperFluids, and nanobeads, as well as the benefits and drawbacks Here, we concentrate on the creation of nano-based vaccines as "nanovaccines" for stimulating immune systems, as well as the anticipated benefits and drawbacks in comparison to currently available vaccines. We also discuss a possible nanorisk for vaccines, known as nanobacterial contamination.

Keywords

Nanocarrier; Nanovaccine; Bacterial spore; Proteosome; Exosome; Liposome; Virosome; SuperFluid; Nanobead

INTRODUCTION

The best method for lowering high rates of morbidity and mortality as well as the significant social and economic costs associated with diseases is vaccination. Vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to launch an attack against particular targets like cancer cells and microbes. Whole tumour cell vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, idiotype vaccinations, adjuvant or antigen vaccines, viral vectors, and DNA vaccines are just a few of the vaccines that can be utilised to treat cancer. Vaccines are often well tolerated and have useful anticancer benefits in some circumstances, even though the immunologic response is not always enough to stop the growth of cancer. Cancer-associated antigens that are often absent from healthy cells are included in antigen cancer vaccines. Adjuvants are additional ingredients used to activate immune responses against antigens, destroying cancerous cells without hurting healthy cells and preventing recurrence [1]. While inert protein-based vaccinations are less effective, infection can prevent subsequent disease by inducing both humoral and cellular immunity. Although CD8 T cells are notoriously difficult to activate through vaccination and immunotherapy, they are essential for protective immunity against several intracellular infections and cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The logistics of vaccine distribution are crucial for vaccines that require a certain immunization schedule with repeated doses, such as prime-boost, which are extremely effective but difficult to give.

Simple inert nanocarriers that can produce substantial protection after a single dosage could be helpful for a number of applications as a novel strategy [2]. These nanomaterials can be divided into two categories: naturally occurring nanoparticles and artificial nanoparticles. In reality, nanobiotechnology is specifically employed to create a new generation of vaccines that are more effective (i.e., nanovaccines) and can get past the numerous biological, biophysical, and biomedical barriers the body constructs to prevent traditional intervention. Due to their small size and adaptability, nanoparticles hold great potential for cancer therapy since they can target tumours specifically. Similar to this, nanosized particles have been utilised to create vaccines against microorganisms [3]. Typically, particles between 0.1 and 100 nm are considered to be nanoparticles. A variety of materials are used to create nanoparticles, which are then manufactured to transport a variety of drugs in a targeted and regulated manner. Nanocarriers are ready to benefit from basic cancer geometries and modes of development, including rapid cell growth, antigen expression, and leaky tumour blood vessels. Additionally, nanocarriers show promise as DNA vaccine delivery vehicles [4]. There are also nanoemulsions and nanosized aerosol vaccinations in development. Researchers are working to create novel materials for vectors that interact specifically and consistently with cells, despite the fact that numerous publications have demonstrated that secure, biocompatible materials may be built into nanoparticles that deliver medications or vaccinations. Nanosystems will be developed to get past regular barriers and activate immune system's antigen-presenting cells. These "smart" targetable nanoparticles are being studied by scientists as potential "magic bullets" that may locate and eradicate disease [5].

Nature-made Nanocarriers

As a result, many kinds of nano-scaled materials have been used in the design and production of nanovaccines, based on naturally occurring or artificial nanocarriers. Some examples of nano-sized vehicles that are reviewed here as potential nanocarriers for vaccine administration to immune systems include bacterial spores, Proteosomes, exosomes, liposomes, virosomes, SuperFluids, nanoparticle-based nanobeads, virus-like particles, and bacteriophages [6]. Given their importance in the contamination of vaccinations and some complex diseases, nanobacteria are another crucial topic that needs to be covered in this article. As a result of the discovery of nanobacteria in previously believed to be sterile medical products, we also intend to explore it as a nanohazard in this review [7].

Bacterial Spores

Using macromolecules, particularly polysaccharides, nucleic acids, and proteins, nature has evolved very intricate nanoarchitectures. It should be able to use this science to design and create new artificial structures and tools if we have a basic understanding of how these macromolecules interact to create nanoscaled structures. This "learning from nature" strategy has the advantage of clearly defining the bio nanofabrication mechanisms currently present in bacteria [8]. Intriguing and innovative structures are seen in microorganisms, such as the protective bacterial spore coatings. Bacterial spores are life forms that are latent and have exceptional resistance abilities. These nanostructures have many protein layers that give the spores a flexible and protective cover. The shield has characteristics that are important for integrating Nanobiotechnological areas, like protomers has the ability to manufacture and distribute foreign molecules as well as selfassembling protomers. In fact, the sport coat could be used as a source of innovative self-assembling biomolecules in addition to serving as a delivery system for other compounds. The coat can serve as a tool for prophylactic vaccination and heterologous antigen presentation.

Virus-like Particles

Bacillus spores are particularly attractive candidates for vaccination vehicles due to a variety of characteristics. There are two different methods for immunisation. In the first method, a spore coat gene and an antigen sequence are fused to create an engineered antigen or epitope on the spore coat. By fusing the antigen gene with the transcriptional and translational sequences of an appropriate bacillus gene, the antigen is produced constitutively in the vegetative cell in the second method. Spores containing this altered gene are administered orally [9], where they then germinate in the digestive tract. As a result, the spore offers special characteristics for the creation of nanovaccines that may eventually improve public health in both wealthy and underdeveloped nations.

Bacteriophages

Even though research on the interactions between phage nanobioparticles and animals is still in its early stages, it has been looked at how well-studied phage strains can transmit antigenic gene products. The development of phage vaccines in 1985 demonstrated that it was possible to create bacterio-phages that fused foreign proteins to their regular coat proteins. After phage display technology was described, its potency was significantly increased by utilising affinity selection to separate phages that displayed certain peptides from random peptide collections [10]. The use of this technology to create vaccinations and diagnostics has taken off as an industry. It was also possible to use particular epitopes that had been selected based on biological experimentation. In this case, mice nasally exposed with live respiratory syncytial virus were completely immunologically protected by a vaccine using a phage display method. A phage containing a gene product for protection against Yersinia pestis infections was created using a similar methodology. It was shown that intramuscular phage vaccinations with the phage vaccine induced considerably stronger phage IgG2 responses than did plasmid DNA vaccinations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In its infancy, nanobiotechnology in nanomedicine has the potential to fundamentally alter medical research in the twentyfirst century. For analytical, nanoimaging, nanodiagnostic, nanotherapeutic, and nanovaccination purposes, nanocarriers can be used. The usage of nanobiotechnologies will be enhanced by goals including combating cancer, drug delivery, enhancing cell-material interactions, tissue engineering scaffolds, gene delivery systems, and offering creative opportunities in the battle against incurable diseases. There has been significant advancement in understanding the role of biological nanostructures and their interaction and integration with other non-living systems as a result of increased knowledge of nanobiotechnological technologies and procedures. The biocompatibility of the nanomaterials that are ingested into the body is a major outstanding problem that needs to be taken into account.

CONCLUSION

The utilisation of several cutting-edge nanoscale materials and nanocarriers is anticipated to have a hugely good effect on people's health. In fact, using nanocarriers to transport the vaccination components can greatly lessen the negative effects. For instance, the goal is to promote health by adopting nanobiotechnological methods to increase the efficacy and safety of vaccination. However, the security of nanovaccines is just as crucial. The usage of nanovaccines has been found to benefit from this theory. However, the particles in nanovaccines are eliminated gradually over a lengthy period of time, which may cause toxicity and make nanobacterial contamination probable. To demonstrate the varied responses and activities of various nanomaterials in living systems, some scientists have evaluated them using various assays in recent years. The nanotoxicity of nanomaterials and their safety in human investigations were also predicted. By combining high-throughput assays and assessment acceleration with nanomaterials for clinical trials, their work will aid in accelerating the nanotoxicological tracking of nanomaterials in the near future to manage diseases.

REFERENCES

  1. Miller MA, Pisani E. The cost of unsafe injections. Bull World Health Organ. 1999; 77(10):808-11.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Alkilani AZ, McCrudden MTC, Donnelly RF. Transdermal drug delivery: Innovative pharmaceutical developments based on disruption of the barrier properties of the stratum corneum. Pharmaceutics. 2015; 7(4):438-470.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Scheuplein RJ. Mechanism of percutaneous absorption. II. Transient diffusion and the relative importance of various routes of skin penetration. J Invest Dermatol. 1967; 48(1):79–88.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Kirby M, Hutton ARJ, Donnelly RF. Microneedle Mediated Transdermal Delivery of Protein, Peptide and Antibody Based Therapeutics: Current Status and Future Considerations. Pharm Res.2020; 37(6):117.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Quinn HL, Kearney MC, Courtenay AJ, McCrudden MT, Donnelly RF. The role of microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 ;11(11):1769-1780
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2004; 56(5):581–597.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Tuan-Mahmood TM, McCrudden MTC, Torrisi BM, McAlister E, Garland MJ, Singh TRR, et al. Microneedles for intradermal and transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013 ;50(5):623-637
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Chen M, Quan G, Sun Y, Yang D, Pan X, Wu C. Nanoparticles-encapsulated polymeric microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2020; 325:163-175.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Oh SJ, Jung JH. Sustainable Drug Release Using Nanoparticle Encapsulated Microneedles. Chemistry - An Asian Journal. John Wiley and Sons. 2022.
  18. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology. 2008; 26: 1261–1268.
  19. Google Scholar

Citation: Christian G (2022) Concerns Involving Nanobiotechnology in Contemporary Vaccines Include Nanobacteria, Nanocarriers, and Nanovaccines. J Nanomed Nanotech. 13: 642.

Copyright: ©2022 Christian G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.