Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Biomaterials Function in Applications for Stem Cell Therapy

Varun Kumar^* Department of Stem Cell Biology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
^*Correspondence: Varun Kumar, Department of Stem Cell Biology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, Email:

Received: 04-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. JSCRT-23-23465; Editor assigned: 06-Oct-2023, Pre QC No. JSCRT-23-23465(PQ); Reviewed: 23-Oct-2023, QC No. JSCRT-23-23465; Revised: 30-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. JSCRT-23-23465(R); Published: 06-Nov-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2157-7633.23.13.619

Description

Biomaterials have emerged as indispensable tools in the field of regenerative medicine, gives unprecedented opportunities to join the potential of stem cells for tissue repair and regeneration. Stem cells possess the unique ability to differentiate into various cell types, making them a promising source for the treatment of degenerative diseases, tissue injuries, and organ transplantation. However, the success of stem cell- based therapies heavily depends on creating an optimal microenvironment that supports cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. This is where biomaterials come into play. Biomaterials, with their diverse range of properties, can simulator the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) and provide structural support, signaling cues, and controlled release of bioactive molecules; We will delve into the world of biomaterials for stem cell applications, exploring their key properties, various types, and their role in advancing regenerative medicine.

Properties of biomaterials for stem cells

Biocompatibility: One of the fundamental properties of biomaterials is biocompatibility. Stem cells are highly sensitive to their microenvironment, and any adverse reactions with the biomaterial can delay their functionality. Biocompatible materials are non-toxic and do not induce an immune response when in contact with living tissues. This ensures that the biomaterial does not negatively impact the viability and function of stem cells.

Scaffold structure: Biomaterials often serve as scaffolds that provide mechanical support to stem cells. The scaffold's architecture, including its porosity, pore size, and surface area, plays a vital role in regulating stem cell behavior. A well-designed scaffold should allow for cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation while maintaining the structural integrity necessary for tissue formation.

Surface chemistry: The surface chemistry of biomaterials influences cell-surface interactions. Researchers can modify biomaterial surfaces to enhance cell adhesion, spreading, and differentiation. Functional groups and bioactive molecules can be incorporated to promote specific cell responses, such as osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation.

Biodegradability: For applications where the biomaterial needs to be gradually replaced by natural tissue, biodegradability is a vital property. Biodegradable materials break down over time, allowing cells to remodel the tissue and replace the biomaterial with native extracellular matrix components [1-4].

Types of biomaterials for stem cells

Hydrogels: Hydrogels are three-dimensional networks of hydrophilic polymers that can absorb and retain large amounts of water. They have become a popular choice for stem cell culture and tissue engineering due to their similarity to the ECM's mechanical properties. Hydrogels can be engineered to provide specific biochemical and mechanical signals, making them suitable for a wide range of applications, including cartilage, bone, and neural tissue regeneration.

Nano fibrous scaffolds: Nano fibrous scaffolds offer a high surface area and nano scale topography that mimics the natural ECM. They can be created through electro spinning, a technique that produces ultrafine fibers from polymer solutions. Nano fibrous scaffolds provide an excellent platform for stem cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, making them ideal for skin, nerve, and vascular tissue engineering.

Porous ceramics: Porous ceramics, such as calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite, are commonly used for bone tissue engineering. Their excellent biocompatibility and similarity to natural bone mineral make them attractive options for supporting stem cell growth and differentiation into osteoblasts. Porous ceramics also facilitate the release of growth factors and other signaling molecules.

Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM): dECM is derived from natural tissues by removing cellular components, leaving behind the native ECM structure and composition. This biomaterial provides an authentic microenvironment for stem cells, enabling them to interact with tissue-specific signals. dECM-based scaffolds have shown ability in applications such as heart and liver regeneration.

Synthetic polymers: Synthetic polymers, including Poly Lactic- Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) can be precisely engineered to control mechanical properties, degradation rates, and surface chemistry. These materials gives versatility and are commonly used for stem cell encapsulation, drug delivery, and tissue engineering.

Applications of biomaterials in stem cell therapies

Orthopedic tissue regeneration: Stem cells, particularly Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), hold great potential for repairing damaged bone and cartilage tissues. Biomaterials such as hydrogels and porous ceramics have been employed to create scaffolds that support the growth and differentiation of MSCs into bone-forming osteoblasts or cartilage-producing chondrocytes. These materials also provide a controlled release of growth factors, enhancing tissue regeneration [5-8].

Cardiovascular repair: Heart diseases remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Biomaterials play a vital role in cardiac tissue engineering, providing the necessary support for stem cell- based therapies. Researchers are exploring the use of dECM and hydrogel scaffolds to improve stem cell engraftment and promote myocardial regeneration after heart injuries.

Neurological disorders: The treatment of neurological disorders often involves the transplantation of neural stem cells or induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-derived neurons. Biomaterials, particularly Nano fibrous scaffolds and hydrogels provide a conducive microenvironment for neural cell growth, axonal guidance, and synaptogenesis. These materials hold undertaking for conditions like spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative diseases.

Wound healing: Chronic wounds, such as diabetic ulcers, can be challenging to treat. Biomaterials, especially hydrogels, have been engineered to deliver growth factors and create a supportive environment for stem cells to facilitate tissue regeneration. These materials can also be made to release antimicrobial agents, preventing infection in the wound [9,10].

Biomaterials have emerged as indispensable tools in the field of regenerative medicine, enabling the harnessing of stem cells' immense potential for tissue repair and regeneration. These materials possess key properties such as biocompatibility, scaffold structure, surface chemistry, and biodegradability, which make them ideal for supporting stem cell growth and differentiation. Various types of biomaterials, including hydrogels, Nano fibrous scaffolds, porous ceramics, dECM, and synthetic polymers, are being explored for a wide range of applications, from orthopedic tissue regeneration to neurological disorders and wound healing. Despite the significant progress made in this field, several challenges remain, including addressing immunogenicity, navigating regulatory approval processes, achieving scalability, advancing personalized medicine, and developing multifunctional biomaterials. As researchers continue to innovate and refine biomaterial-based stem cell therapies, the potential for revolutionizing regenerative medicine and providing useful methods for patients with debilita- ting diseases and injuries grows ever brighter.

References

1. Abagnale G, Steger M, Nguyen VH, Hersch N, Sechi A, Joussen S, et.al. Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. Biomaterials. 2015;61:316-326.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE, Pegrum SM. Locomotion of fibroblasts in culture: V. Surface marking with concanavalin A. Exp Cell Res.1972;73(2):536-539.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Abercrombie MT, Heaysman JE, Pegrum SM. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture: IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1971;67(2):359-367.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Agrawal S, Srivastava R. Osteoinductive and osteoconductive biomaterials. Racing for the Surface. 2020:355-395.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Al-Haque S, Miklas JW, Feric N, Chiu LL, Chen WL, Simmons CA, et.al. Hydrogel substrate stiffness and topography interact to induce contact guidance in cardiac fibroblasts. Macromol Biosci. 2012;12(10):1342-1353.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Alghfeli L, Parambath D, Manzoor S, Roach HI, Oreffo RO, El-Serafi AT. Synthesis of scaffold-free, three dimensional, osteogenic constructs following culture of skeletal osteoprogenitor cells on glass surfaces. Bone Rep. 2021;15:101143.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;40(5): 363-408.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Aminuddin NI, Ahmad R, Akbar SA, Pingguan-Murphy B. Osteoblast and stem cell response to nanoscale topographies: a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2016;17(1):698-714.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Anderson JM. Inflammatory response to implants. ASAIO Trans. 1988;34(2):101-107.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immuno. 2008:20(2):86-100.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]