Mini Article - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 2
Received: 11-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. PDS-22-15711; Editor assigned: 14-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. PDS-22-15711 (PQ); Reviewed: 28-Feb-2022, QC No. PDS-22-15711; Revised: 07-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. PDS-22-15711 (R); Published: 14-Mar-2022, DOI: 10.35248/2167-1052.22.11.264
Biological therapies are increasingly used for the treatment of inflammatory arthritides and certain autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Biological agents target specific components of the immune system such as cytokines and their receptors, as well as T and B cells. Thus, the function of an intact immune system is altered and many autoimmune adverse manifestations and paradoxical reactions can take place. In this narrative mini review, we highlight the most common adverse manifestations that may develop during the use of biological therapies while treating rheumatic diseases. Under these circumstances, close follow-up and monitoring and a thorough clinical evaluation are mandatory for early recognition and treatment of these disorders.
Biological therapies; Autoimmune adverse manifestations; Paradoxical inflammation; Side effects
In the last two decades biological therapies are increasingly used for a number of Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (ARD), which achieved a great improvement in treating these disorders [1,2]. Among them are the biologic (b) Disease-Modifying Anti- Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFα), Interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-17, IL-12/23 as well as T and B cells [3,4]. The use of bDMARDs has revolutionized the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Spondylo Arthropathies (SpA), psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), as well as Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE) and vasculitis [3-7]. On the other hand, targeting cytokines or T and B cells, which have a key role for the milieu of the immune system, adverse reactions may occur [8]. When using bDMARDs, predisposition to infections such as viral, bacterial and opportunisticis a matter of concern [9]. Furthermore, many autoimmune adverse manifestations and diseases have emerged during the use of bDMARDs ranging from the discovery of an isolated autoantibody, mostly Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA), to organ specific (e.g. uveitis), or systemic ARDs such as SLE and vasculitis [10,11]. In this short narrative review, we will discuss the most common autoimmune adverse manifestations occurring during the treatment with bDMARDs, especially TNFα inhibitors (TNFαi), but also with other biological therapies.
This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. All presented material is published after written consent of the patients, although sensitive data and personal details are not included in the publication.
The most commonly used agents are TNFαi which comprise the monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs), Adalimumab (ADA), Golimumab (GOL), Infliximab (INF), the soluble TNFα receptor igG Fc fusion protein Etanercept (ETN), and the PEGylated antibody fragment Certolizumab (CTZ). Anakinra is an IL-1 receptor antagonist, while canakinumab is a mAb against IL-1. Tocilizumab (TCZ) and sarilumab (SAR) are IL-6 receptor antagonists. Ustekinumab is a mAb targeting IL-12/23, while secukinumab and ixekizumab are mAbs against IL-17A. Abataceptis acytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) igG fusion protein interfering with T-cells, while rituximab is a mAb targeting CD20 molecule of B-cells and belimumab targets the B-cell activator factor (BAFF) [3-7,12,13]. Furthermore, several bio-similars mostly ADA and ETN, as well as rituximab biosimilar have been developed and approved for the treatment of ARD [14,15] (Table 1).
TNFα inhibitors | IL-1 inhibitors | IL-6 inhibitors | IL-12/23 inhibitors | IL-17 inhibitors | T-cell inhibitors | B-cell inhibitors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adalimumab | Anakinra | Tocilizumab | Ustekinumab | Secukinumab | Abatacept | Rituximab |
Golimumab | ||||||
Infliximab | Canakinumab | Sarilumab | Ixekizumab | Belimumab | ||
Etanercept | ||||||
Certolizumab |
Table 1: Biologic drugs used in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Autoimmune adverse manifestations and the development of diseases like SLE, Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), vasculitis and others are often reported to occur during the treatment with TNFαi [11,12,16,17].
The clinical manifestations may appear several weeks or months after the initiation of TNFα blocker sand are the result of a reaction characterized by signs and symptoms as well as serological demonstratoin of et hdisease.
Lupus is a disease that can be developed not uncommonly after treatment with these agents. Its diagnosis requires the identification of a temporal association between TNFαi administration and the development of symptoms in an individual without pre-existing lupus [11,12].
The clinical manifestations of lupus are expressed mostly with erythematous skin lesions affecting the face in a butterfly distribution, the arms, the upper part of the thorax but also other parts of the body, in a photosensitivity distribution (Figures 1 and 2) [18-24].
Figure 1: A 62-year-old woman with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab. Six months after treatment, she developed diffuse erythematous skin eruptions in sun exposed areas affecting the face, forehead and the upper region of the chest.
Figure 2: A 60-year-old man with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept developed erythematous skin lesions affecting the face in a butterfly distribution, 4 months after initiation of the treatment. Note also the periocular and forehead erythema.
In addition, annular or psoriasis form rashes as well as discoid lesions may develop (Figure 3) [25]. Other clinical manifestations include arthralgia as, synovitis, myalgia as, constitutional symptoms, while pleurisy, kidney, or Central Nervous System (CNS) diseases are not uncommon.
Figure 3: A 32-year-old woman with ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab developed erythematosus eruptions affecting her face (not shown) as well as psoriasis form lesions affecting the upper part of the back 5 months after treatment.
The occurrence of lupus after TNFαi treatment varies between studies ranging from 0.1%-1%, while the presence of ANA ranges from 39%-100% and double stranded (ds) DNA from 10%-50% [11,12,26-30].
The occurrence of APS is approximately 1%, while the presence of anti-Cardiolipin (aCl) antibodies between 7%-12% [16,17]. As far as it concerns the treatment, in patients with mild manifestations of lupus, discontinuation of the offended TNF-α blocker may be a sufficient measure. In some cases, small doses of prednisone with or without topical use of calcineurin inhibitors may be useful. In patients who develop systemic disease with kidney or CNS manifestations, high doses of prednisone along with immunosuppressive drugs are required [11,12].
The involved pathogenetic mechanism for the development of lupus after TNFαi is not well understood. One hypothesis implies that TNFαi, by blocking the TNFα cell membrane, can induce cell apoptosis releasing antigenic material which acts as a foreign antigen, leading to the generation of autoantibodies and the development of lupus. Another hypothesis is that TNFαi can interfere with Th1/Th2 response, leading to the production of Interferon (IFN) α, which is involved in the pathogenesis of lupus [31-33].
Paradoxical inflammation is an intriguing adverse event of biological therapies. It mostly occurs during treatment with TNFαi. It is presented as the same type of clinical manifestations for which the agents are effectively used for. Patients with RA, psoriasis, SpA and IBD may be affected [34-36]. Thus, paradoxical inflammation can be manifested as psoriasis, colitis, arthritis, uveitis and several other dermatological clinical features [34-36]. The most common is the development of psoriasis form skin lesions affecting mainly the palmoplantar regions, scalp, hands butother skin areas may also be affected (Figures 4 and 5) [37,38]. The occurrence of psoriatic skin lesions in RA patients treated with TNF-α blockers range between 0.6%-5.3%, in SpA 4%, while in IBD between 1.6%-10% [10]. The pathogenesis of paradoxical inflammation following TNFαi has not been fully elucidated. It is postulated that TNFαi may cause a cytokine shift of TNFα and IFNα. It is well demonstrated that plasmacytoid cells produce high amounts of IFNα, which accumulate in the skin, and it is responsible for psoriasis development. On the contrary, TNFα prevents the generation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells and down-regulate the production of IFNα. Thus, by blocking TNFα using TNFαi, the production of IFNα is increased by plasmacytoid cells with the development of psoriasis [10]. TNFαi bio-similars have been reported to induce the same adverse event like the bio-originators (Figure 4). Indeed, SB4 an ETN bio-similars, can induce psoriasis affecting the palms of the hands in a patient suffering from RA [39]. Rituximab is used to treat RA and SLE, among other diseases. It has been reported from case reports, the development of psoriasis form skin lesions during rituximab therapy [40].
Figure 4: A 30-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis treated with ABP501, an adalimumab biosimilar developed psoriasiform lesions affecting the plantar regions of the feet 4 months after the initiation of therapy.
Figure 5: A 58-year-old woman with seropositive RA. Eight months after treatment with adalimumab developed psoriasis form eruptions, affecting the palm of the hands.
Another paradoxical manifestation due to TNFαi use is the development of Granuloma Annulare (GA). Several studies describe GA during ADA, ETN and INF treatment in patients suffering from RA, SpA, and psoriasis [41,42]. GA has been described also in patients with RA receiving secukinumab and TCZ [43,44]. In addition, erythema multi-forme, skin vasculitis, folliculitis, vitiligo, and alopecia have also been described among others [35]. Regarding the treatment, discontinuation of the offended drug may be sufficient in mild cases. However, in some cases small doses of prednisone and topical steroids are required [10].
TNFαi may lead to the development of Neurological Diseases (ND) affecting the CNS as well as the peripheral nervous system. Indeed, Demyelinating Diseases (DD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS)- like lesions, myelitis, optic neuritis, as well as mono-neuritis multiplex, sensorimotor polyneuropathy, Myasthenia Gravis (MG) and others have been described in case reports, case series, retrospective and prospective studies [45-50]. The pathophysiological mechanism of this phenomenon is not clear. A hypothesis suggests that TNFαi may increase autoreactive Tcells in the periphery which invade CNS causing MS-like lesions. Another hypothesis implies that TNFαi downregulate IL-10 and upregulate IL-12 and INFγ responsible for this disorder. Finally, TNFαi may cause downregulation of TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2), responsible for oligodendrocytes proliferation and damage repair [10]. Furthermore, the use of rituximab has been reported to develop Progressive Multi-focal Leukoencephalopathy (PML), which is a reactivation of John Cunningham Virus (JCV). In these disorders discontinuation of the responsible agent is mandatory [51-53].
In addition to the afore mentioned paradoxical autoimmune disorders, inflammatory myopathy, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, and uveitis have also been described in case reports, case series and retrospective studies [54-56].
Nowadays, bDMARDs, especially TNFαi have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory arthritides and certain ARDs, by demonstrating good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. However, their use may interfere with the immune system functions, thus many autoimmune adverse manifestations, paradoxical reactions and diseases may develop. Between them SLE-like manifestations, psoriasis form reactions, granuloma annulare, MS-like disorders, MG and many others have been described. Thus, physicians using bDMARDs should have their patients in a close follow-up and monitoring, along with a minute and careful examination in order to recognize early these adverse manifestations and to treat them appropriately.
The authors thank Ms. Chrysa Arvaniti for her excellent secretarial assistance.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
All authors have made substantial contribution to the current manuscript and have approved the final version fulfilling all the four criteria requested by the ICNJE. EP: drafting, PVV revision, AAD: conception of the work, revision.
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
[CrossRef], [GoogleScholar], [PubMed]
Citation: Drosos AA, Pelechas E, Voulgari PV (2022) Biological Therapies: Induced Autoimmune Adverse Manifestations. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 11:264.
Copyright: © 2022 Drosos AA et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.