Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development

Artificial Intelligence in Smart Aquaculture Infrastructure

Kaelen Thorne^* Department of Aquaculture Engineering, Westshore University of Marine Sciences, Clearwater, New Zealand
^*Correspondence: Kaelen Thorne, Department of Aquaculture Engineering, Westshore University of Marine Sciences, Clearwater, New Zealand, Email:

Received: 01-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. JARD-25-28611; Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2025, Pre QC No. JARD-25-28611 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jan-2025, QC No. JARD-25-28611; Revised: 24-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. JARD-25-28611 (R); Published: 31-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35248/2155-9546.25.16.947

Description

Aquaculture is rapidly evolving as one of the primary sources of animal protein for the growing global population. With wild fish stocks declining and the demand for seafood increasing, aquaculture offers a sustainable alternative. However, the sector faces challenges in terms of resource efficiency, disease control, and environmental sustainability. To address these issues, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into aquaculture infrastructure-often referred to as “smart aquaculture”-is emerging as a transformative solution. AI technologies are enabling more precise, automated, and efficient aquaculture operations, especially within closed-loop systems such as Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) [1,2].

Smart aquaculture infrastructure powered by AI leverages advanced data collection, machine learning, and automation to enhance every stage of fish production. Central to these systems are an array of interconnected devices, including real-time sensors, underwater cameras, actuators, and cloud-based platforms. These tools continuously monitor environmental parameters such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonia levels, and turbidity. AI algorithms process the data, identify trends, and make real-time decisions to maintain optimal rearing conditions, ultimately improving fish health and minimizing environmental risks [3,4].

One of the most significant areas where AI has proven its value is in feeding management. Feed typically accounts for over 50% of operational costs in aquaculture. Overfeeding not only wastes resources but also leads to poor water quality and increased disease susceptibility. AI-driven feeding systems utilize behavioral analysis and metabolic modeling to determine the exact timing and quantity of feed. Using camera-based computer vision and machine learning, these systems observe fish activity and adjust feed dispersion accordingly. The result is improved feed conversion ratios (FCR), faster growth rates, and significant cost savings [4-8].

Another critical application of AI in smart aquaculture is disease prediction and management. Infectious diseases are among the leading causes of mortality and economic loss in aquaculture. By using machine learning models trained on historical data and current environmental parameters, AI can identify early warning signs of disease outbreaks. These models analyze variables such as water quality trends, fish movement patterns, and feeding behavior to detect anomalies indicative of stress or illness. Early detection allows farmers to take timely preventive measures, reducing the need for antibiotics and improving overall stock survival.

Global case studies highlight the growing success of AIintegrated aquaculture systems. In Norway, AI is being used to monitor and optimize salmon farming operations in land-based RAS facilities. These systems have shown improvements in water use efficiency, reduced mortality rates, and enhanced overall productivity. Similarly, in Singapore, urban aquaculture setups rely on AI algorithms to maintain precise control of water chemistry, leading to more consistent and higher yields. These examples demonstrate that AI is not only applicable to largescale operations but can also be adapted for compact, urban, or resource-limited environments [9]. 

While the benefits of AI in aquaculture infrastructure are clear, there are also barriers to widespread implementation. The high cost of installing advanced sensor networks and AI systems can be prohibitive for small and medium-sized enterprises. Furthermore, AI systems require large, high-quality datasets to train accurate predictive models. In many regions, such datasets are either unavailable or poorly managed. Additionally, there is a need for skilled personnel to operate and maintain these systems, interpret AI-generated data, and make informed decisions. 

To overcome these challenges, several strategies are being developed. Innovations such as edge computing, low-cost sensors, and user-friendly AI platforms are making smart aquaculture more accessible. Governments and academic institutions are also investing in pilot programs to promote technology transfer and training. Collaborative efforts between the private sector, research organizations, and policymakers are essential to building the capacity required for broader AI adoption in aquaculture. Looking ahead, the future of AI in aquaculture holds even greater promise. Emerging trends include the integration of blockchain technology for traceability, AI-powered robotics for automated cleaning and harvesting, and predictive analytics for supply chain optimization. These advancements will further reduce labor costs, increase transparency, and enhance food safety [10].

References

1. Muhammed D, Ahvar E, Ahvar S, Trocan M, Montpetit MJ, Ehsani R, et al. Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) for smart agriculture: A review of architectures, technologies and solutions. J Netw Comput Appl. 2024;1:103905.

   [Google Scholar]

2. Dewi T, Risma P, Oktarina Y, Dwijayanti S, Mardiyati EN, Sianipar AB, et al. Smart integrated aquaponics system: Hybrid solar-hydro energy with deep learning forecasting for optimized energy management in aquaculture and hydroponics. 2025;85:101683.

   [Google Scholar]

3. Chandramenon P, Aggoun A, Tchuenbou-Magaia F. Smart approaches to Aquaponics 4.0 with focus on water quality-Comprehensive review. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;225:109256.

   [Google Scholar]

4. Thilakarathne NN, Bakar MS, Abas PE, Yassin H. Internet of things enabled smart agriculture: Current status, latest advancements, challenges and countermeasures. Heliyon. 2025.

   [CrossRef][Google Scholar][PubMed]

5. Ubina NA, Lan HY, Cheng SC, Chang CC, Lin SS, Zhang KX, et al. Digital twin-based intelligent fish farming with Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT). AgriTech. 2023;5:100285.

   [Google Scholar]

6. Mandal S, Yadav A, Panme FA, Devi KM, SM SK. Adaption of smart applications in agriculture to enhance production. agtech. 2024;13:100431.

   [Google Scholar]

7. Biazi V, Marques C. Industry 4.0-based smart systems in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Aquac Eng. 2023;103:102360.

   [Google Scholar]

8. Cengiz B, Adam IY, Ozdem M, Das R. A survey on data fusion approaches in IoT-based smart cities: Smart applications, taxonomies, challenges, and future research directions. Inf Fusion. 2025;24:103102.

   [Google Scholar]

9. Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Keogh JG. The nexus of IoT and aquaculture: A bibliometric analysis. Appl Food Res. 2025;16:100838.

   [Google Scholar]

10. Zhang S, Chen R, Wu J, Zhu N. Scale measurement and economic effect evaluation of smart agriculture in China. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2025;99:102195.

    [Google Scholar]